General Charles Cornwallis:Britain's Smart, Yet Stupid Mistake

British cosmopolitan Charles Cornwallis had a ensueing role in the the Statesn Revolution. With bug out his help, the British force would invite been all oercome a plenitude to begin with than they did. However, although his skills were striking and his heart was in the right brand for his country, Cornwallis did non have the required intellect to conquer America and ask victory in the name of the king. He fought austere in his participations, just now at the expense of much bloodletting of his own soldiers. Many battles were won because of the sacrifices he make, which in like manner last point to his demise. Thus, Cornwallis was a great British commander and prevai sink in many an(prenominal) battles, but collect to his rashness, he was overthrown by the Ameri arsehole Patriots. To begin, Charles Cornwallis was by many known as a great leader. He began fighting in the Revolution after(prenominal) the British victory in Charleston, South Carolina in the leaping of 1780 . His hopes lead him to the southern colonies as a ecumenical. This meant that his men had to be led in some(prenominal) different battles. He fought in the battles of Princeton (1777), Brandywine (1777), Camden (1781), Guilford Courthouse (1781), and siege of Yorktown (1781) . He was successful in three out of his cardinal battles; Brandywine in Birmingham Pennsylvania, Camden in saucily Jersey, and Guilford Courthouse in compass north Carolina. Cornwallis prove himself to be an asset to the British, since he could triumphantly over prepare on these places in the colonies. Cornwallis showed the Americans that he could handle authoritative an entire army and leading(a) them to victories in the colonies. Therefore, Charles Cornwallis was recognised as a worthy global, hoping to lead Britain to a successful victory over the rebel Americans. The general tried to prove himself well in the battles which he commanded and fought. However, in many cases he did many actions that can be expound as re! ckless, a big gamble, wild, and stupid. It is utter that people who did take real risks, like Cornwallis, suffered total scourge . For example, in January of 1777, the general went after General upper-case letter to retaliate his defeat at Trenton. Little did Cornwallis know that working slap-up snuck from behind with his 5200 men into Princeton. Thus, Washington caused 400 British casualties and nevertheless suffered 40 deaths for the Americans . This shows that one should invariably watch their back and weigh in e very direction. Although Cornwallis triumphed in the battle of Guilford Courthouse in 1781, he caused many deaths in his army which lead his defeat in the end of the war. He encountered General Nathaniel Greene who was very clever. Cornwallis won at the expense of 30% of his army, whereas the searching Greene only lost a few . Cornwallis was not thought straight in this battle and only had his eye on the goal, not on his men. Furthermore, this is als o shown on the 7th of April, 1781; where he finally counts his men, only to introduce that half of his troops were absent! He did not bid for his troops well, which adversely effect his ability to become a great General. On folk 30, 1781 in Yorktown, Cornwallis gave up his outer(a) lines, which meant that the American and French associate could overtake his inner defence. The Americans and French had Cornwallis trapped and he failed in a counterattack on October 16th. On October 19, Cornwallis could not put himself to lay off, so he made Charles O?Hara, second in command; deliver his blade to the victors.

However, Cornwallis w rote multiple letters to Washington in terms of the s! urrender of Yorktown. It off-key out to be Britain?s superlative multitude defeat in many generations. The lack of men the reckless general had in his command, and the way he treated them, turned to be one of the greatest downfall for the British. Hence, Cornwallis made very careless actions which caused him to be foiled in the end. Consequently, General Charles Cornwallis was slenderly a good leader, but made many overhasty decisions which caused Britain to be crushed in the American Revolution. He whitethorn have won several battles, but he was defeated in the war. His carelessness in care for his troops, and his lack of sensation for his surroundings all caused his ruin. level so, without Cornwallis, defeat may have come quicker and harsher. In conclusion, General Cornwallis did aid Britain and contributed in the American Revolution, but was overthrown due to his lack in leaders skills, which inevitably caused the British to brook the war. Bibliography:Morris, Ri chard. The Life memoir of the get together States 1775-1789 . 2. NJ: Time-Life Books, 1974. Murray, Stewart. American Revolution. New York: DK Publishing Inc, 2005. Sons of the American Revolution. calendar of Revolutionary Events 13 kinfolk 2006 . Taylor, Quintard. United States History. War of independency 13 Sep 2006 . Wiegand, Steve. U.S. History for Dummies. New York: Wiley Publishing Inc, 2001. If you desire to get a honorable essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay